Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) and
Credit Transfer Policy and Procedures
Policy Statement
BERKELEY is committed to providing high-quality service and to maintaining the highest standards for its learners, and other stakeholders. Recognition of prior learning and transfer of credit exists to enable learners to avoid duplication of learning and assessment. This policy explains what is defined as the recognition of prior learning and credit transfer, and BERKELEY’s policies for applying these.
Policy Relevance
This policy defines recognition of prior learning and credit transfer, the circumstances in which they may be applicable to learners, and the policies for applying them where relevant.
Policy Responsibility and Review
This policy is the responsibility of the
Quality Manager and will be reviewed regularly.
Recognition of Prior Learning
Recognition of prior learning (RPL) allows
for a learner to be recognized for certain learning they have previously
undertaken which has not been certificated or accredited through the RQF
(Regulated Qualifications Framework) or QCF (Qualifications and Credit
Framework), towards the regulated/unregulated qualification being studied.
If approved for RPL, the learner does not
need to attend learning for the approved unit(s), but must still undertake the
assessment in full in order to achieve the assessment criteria.
The learner must provide evidence of prior
work, learning, and/or achievement, for consideration. This must be fully
evidenced, valid, and reliable, and mapped to the learning outcomes and
assessment criteria of all units for which the RPL claim is being made.
RPL may be claimed against a whole unit or
several units. It is not possible to claim part units.
Under some circumstances, there may be a
limit to the proportion of the qualification that can be achieved by RPL,
and/or specific rules may apply to RPL eligibility of certain units. Full
details of any requirements will be identified in the rule s of combination for
any regulated/unregulated qualifications offered by BERKELEY.
BERKELEY remains the role of the assessor
and internal quality assurance staff to ensure that assessment criteria are
only deemed to have been met where assessment is valid, reliable and fit for
purpose, and where evidence is adequate, sufficient, and authentic. The process
of RPL is subject to the same standard of scrutiny through the application of
existing quality assurance and monitoring processes as any other form of
assessment. RPL assessments should be included in standardization and
evaluation activities so that processes are reviewed, as with all other
assessments.
Where RPL is used towards a learner’s
achievement of a regulated/unregulated qualification, a learner will still be
charged the full fee for the qualification being claimed, as the full
qualification is still subject to full external quality assurance of the
assessment, by BERKELEY.
Credit Transfer
Credit transfer allows for previously
accredited achievement to count towards another regulated/unregulated
qualification, where it is either allowed as an equivalency within the new
qualification, or where the learner has already achieved one or more exact
unit(s) belonging to that qualification.
In the case of approved credit transfer,
the learner does not need to repeat their assessment.
The learner must provide evidence of
certification for the unit(s) to the BERKELEY (the certificate itself is not
required where a previous credit the achievement was from BERKELEY).
Credit transfer may be claimed against a whole unit or several units. It is not possible to claim part units.
Eligibility should be checked by the BERKELEY’s
internal quality assurer and:
• Provide evidence of units achieved,
usually by way of the original certificate (not required where previous credit
achievement was from BERKELEY).
• Make an application for credit transfer
to BERKELEY.
Where credit transfer is used towards a
learner’s achievement of a regulated/unregulated qualification, a learner will
still be charged the full fee for the qualification being claimed which
includes checking eligibility for credit transfer and authentication of the
certificate(s).
Staff Development Policies
1. Purpose and Objectives
This policy sets out BERKELEY’s
commitment to the development of its staff, the broad range of development
activities available, the responsibilities of the parties involved and the
funding arrangements for staff development activities.
2. Definitions, Terms, Acronyms
No entries for this document.
3. Policy Scope/Coverage
This policy applies to all BERKELEY staff.
4. Policy Statement
The BERKELEY is dedicated to the pursuit of
learning but is itself required to be a “learning organization”, so that it
can continually improve the provision of learning opportunities to its
students. Staff development is a vital investment from which our staff and the BERKELEY
itself will benefit.
This policy and development activities offered under it are designed to:
All BERKELEY staff have the right and
responsibility to continuously improve the capabilities required for their
current role, and to consider the development required for their possible future
role at a higher level or in another organizational unit. While staff should
proactively develop their capabilities, staff development is a shared
responsibility; heads of organizational units and supervisors have key
responsibilities in supporting staff to identify their skills and development
needs through regular feedback and the performance appraisal process, and to
take up development opportunities.
Discussions of the staff member’s career
aspirations and the creation of a development plan must occur with their supervisor
as part of the annual performance appraisal process, in addition to more
frequent informal conversations. Career progression cannot be guaranteed for
any staff member, and it is noted that not all staff desire to move to a higher
level. Some gain greater job satisfaction by seeking continuous improvement in
their current role, or by moving at a level to another organizational unit. Promotion
occurs in accordance with policies under the Career Development, Increments and
Staff Recognition and Recruitment and Selection – Policy.
5. Types of Development Opportunities
The BERKELEY encourages staff to develop
their capability through a broad range of activities, including (but not
limited to) the following:
6. Responsibility for Staff Development
6.1 Staff Development Committee
Responsibility for the development of the
Staff Development Policy and a program of formal development activities for the
BERKELEY rests with the BERKELEY Staff Development Committee, which advises the
Head of Directors. The Terms of Reference for the Committee and information on
the Staff Development Program that it oversees each year are contained in Staff
Development – Guidelines.
6.2 Heads of organizational units
Heads of organisational units bear the
primary responsibility for implementing this staff development policy by
ensuring that staff are engaged in the performance appraisal process and are
given access to relevant development opportunities.
6.3 Supervisors
Supervisors play a key role in staff
development by assisting staff to identify their strengths and development
needs, offering regular feedback, and by providing encouragement and the time
to participate in development opportunities, and to reflect on, share and apply
what they learn as part of their work.
6.4 Staff
The effectiveness of any staff development
activity depends on the active and purposeful participation of the individuals
involved. Staff have a clear responsibility to identify their strengths and
development needs, seek feedback, and develop their skills to enhance
performance in their current position and adapt to changes in their work, and
to be ready to assume further responsibilities.
7. Equity
Staff development activities must be
accessible on an equitable basis, must promote the principles of equity, and
must reinforce the aims and objectives of BERKELEY’s Equity and Diversity
Plan. Where appropriate, courses must accommodate any specific needs of
employment-disadvantaged groups. Courses must build an understanding of equity
issues relevant to the topic.
8. Funding
While many effective development activities
do not require specific funding (e.g., mentoring, on-the-job training),
organizational units must allocate funding for formal staff development from
the funds under their control.
In addition, the BERKELEY Staff Development
Committee proposes an annual budget for staff development activities and deploys
it appropriately when allocated, including funding the annual Staff Development
Program of courses.